Researchers say ‘important questions stay’ about telehealth’s diagnostic viability

Researchers from the Society to Enhance Prognosis in Medication launched a problem temporary this week geared toward exploring the attain, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and future prospects of telehealth.

By combining literature evaluations and interviews with all kinds of stakeholders, the crew sought to establish probably the most urgent analysis questions on learn how to maximize telediagnosis alternatives – whereas avoiding doable downside areas.  

“We discovered that telediagnosis has potential, though there may be nonetheless a lot to find out about how digital analysis may be completed most successfully,” mentioned Suz Schrandt, senior affected person engagement advisor at SIDM and principal investigator on the challenge, in a press release.   

“We discovered that many sufferers just like the comfort of telemedicine, however we additionally want extra analysis into who’s being left behind within the course of, comparable to small practices or folks with out entry to high-speed Web,” Schrandt continued.  


As a corporation, SIDM focuses on bettering analysis and eliminating hurt from diagnostic error. It companions with stakeholders comparable to sufferers, households and members of the healthcare neighborhood.  

The researchers famous that the COVID-19 pandemic triggered an unlimited paradigm shift in the case of sure telehealth wants.  

“Most out there analysis on telemedicine is targeted on the usage of digital look after upkeep of well being, however use of telemedicine for analysis – telediagnosis – at this scale is unprecedented, creating extra unknowns than knowns about its affect on diagnostic high quality and security,” learn SIDM’s challenge temporary.  

The analysis crew discovered that revealed proof relating to the effectiveness of telemedicine for analysis is pretty restricted.  

“Whereas some proof reveals excessive charges of satisfaction amongst sufferers, different information reveals that such comfort could come at a value,” they wrote.  

“Typically talking, there may be nonetheless a lot to study concerning the effectiveness of telemedicine total, and much more so throughout the ambit of diagnostic high quality and security,” they added.  

Some suppliers flagged the worth in with the ability to see into somebody’s residence to raised perceive particulars about their households and social contexts. On the identical time, they mentioned it was tougher to judge physique language and different visible clues.   

Distant affected person monitoring gadgets had been additionally highlighted as one strategy to allow care continuity and handle any surprising well being occurrences.   

“One problem that emerged inside every stakeholder group was the problem in measuring or evaluating the true affect of telemedicine on high quality and security, and this stays the important thing analysis query that must be addressed,” learn the temporary.   

“Many hospitals and well being techniques had collected information on affected person satisfaction, however these surveys stopped in need of assessing diagnostic accuracy,” it continued.

Researchers famous that the business nonetheless lacks methods to measure diagnostic errors in in-person settings, so it isn’t an unlimited shock that telemedicine lags on this enviornment too.  

They highlighted different analysis questions that also lingered, together with what know-how obstacles sufferers nonetheless face and the way telehealth could make routine evaluations extra environment friendly.  

“May this digital care revolution present a pure start line for extra sturdy research of diagnostic high quality and security?” they wrote.  


Addressing diagnostic errors is a key concern for a lot of stakeholders.  

In 2017, a report from the Nationwide High quality Discussion board discovered that 5% or extra sufferers within the U.S are being incorrectly identified, contributing to as much as 17% of adversarial hospital occasions.

At the moment, the group mentioned digital well being data should not outfitted to help suppliers in arriving at an correct analysis.   

However consultants have pointed to the roles different well being tech, comparable to AI instruments, can play in fixing the problem.  


“Total, analysis priorities relating to the effectiveness of telediagnosis should give attention to what signs require in-person assessments; what the correct mix of in-person and digital care seems to be like; who’s being left behind within the growth of digital care; and what determines success or failure in telediagnosis,” mentioned Dr. Mark Graber, founder and president emeritus of SIDM and co-author of the problem temporary, in a press release.

Kat Jercich is senior editor of Healthcare IT Information.

Twitter: @kjercich

Electronic mail:

Healthcare IT Information is a HIMSS Media publication.

>>> Read More <<<